Clark Howard
Show Information:
Weather Now:
Interactive » Blogs
Your Story

Wed, April 3, 2013

Tattoos NOT for dogs

I've got a story coming up on the PhilCast today about a guy in North Carolina taking some heat for getting his dog a tattoo.

I don't think a dog should have to be put through this for the pleasure of an owner who thinks it's cool.

Oh this guy is trying to say he did it for I-D purposes. Ya, right. That's what a micro-chip is for.

And I was somewhat surprised to read that even PETA is OK with doing this.

If a dog owner doesn't go micro-chip for an I-D then perhaps a small tattoo marking would be okay with me, although it is not something I would ever do to any dog I own.

Going to the extent that this guy did here is just wrong in my opinion. You like tattoos then keep 'em on your own body and leave the ink off your dog.


LATEST BLOGS
There it is. The most popular cereal in Wisconsin is Cinnamon Toast Crunch. On the Thursday PhilCast I'll have a…
posted by Philcast 7 hours ago
Quick mention on yesterday's rain: Isn't it amazing how we take it for granted when it's gone....I had to re-plant…
posted by Daves Blog 1 day ago
Two Wisconsin cities show up on a new list ranking the most entertaining cities in the country. And the winner…
posted by Philcast 1 day ago